March 4, 2019
AWB
   
Fast Facts
Bringing Business Up to Speed
Federal Issues

Top companies, trade associations join forces to support passage of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement

A new coalition of more than 200 employers and trade associations is working to ensure the United States-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade agreement is approved by Congress, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce reports.

The coalition represents farmers and ranchers, manufacturers, technology companies and other employers. (See a list of supporters here.) The group will work to support speedy passage of the new trade deal, and educate Americans about its benefits.

“USMCA is critical to the success of American businesses, farmers, and workers,” Cathy Van Way, Head of Government Relations, Cummins Inc., and coalition co-chair said in a statement. “For Cummins, our two largest export markets in the world are Canada and Mexico, and our trade with these countries has contributed to significant growth and global reach. When Cummins is successful globally, we add high quality jobs in communities across the country.”

Other major industry leaders were quoted in the announcement, from agriculture to manufacturing and shipping.

“USMCA establishes best-in-class rules for e-commerce, digital trade, customs, and intellectual property protection,” said Laura Lane, President for Global Public Affairs at UPS and coalition co-chair. “The agreement includes rules that will help American entrepreneurs and innovators grow their businesses and keep their edge amid tough global competition.”

The U.S. Office of Public Liaison also has information on the USMCA, including these major aspects of the trade deal:

For more details, visit www.USMCACoalition.org, or contact AWB’s Amy Anderson at AmyA@awb.org.



« Back to Main
Workforce Summit This Week
Limiting Worker Choice


Flexible schedules are vital to hospitality industry

By Larry Freshler, a hotel industry professional for 30-plus years

I chose to make my career with hotels because I believe that schedule flexibility is an important benefit of the industry. Scheduling flexibility allows employees to decide when they want to work. Through this option, employees have the opportunity to make the best decisions for their health and the well-being of their families.

As an HR professional, we want to encourage positive working relationships and foster healthy conversations among employees and their employer. Creating a statewide mandate of how employees and employers must interact does not create a good environment or culture. In my experience, no matter where you are in the hotel, as an employee, you have input into your schedule and always have the chance to pick up more shifts if you want them, or vice versa.

A scheduling policy as complex as the one proposed in Olympia would be a logistical nightmare. If this policy were adopted, we would likely need to add staff just to manage the new scheduling demands. Currently we act as a team and schedule our employees taking into considering their schedules and requests. In all my time in HR, I've seen some interesting proposals, but this one limiting the scheduling abilities of employers might be the most burdensome yet...

Read the full guest column in The Spokesman-Review
Attack on Agriculture


Is there slavery in the domestic food supply chain?

By The Capital Press Editorial Board

If the Washington Senate Labor and Commerce Committee has its way, farmers and ranchers who supply large retailers doing business in the Evergreen State could find themselves certifying to those customers that they are not slavers.

Introduced by Seattle Democrat Rebecca Saldana, Senate Bill 5693 mandates that retailers with worldwide sales of more than $200 million require farmers and ranchers to report any incidents of slavery, peonage and human trafficking. Furthermore, the law would require any violation of labor laws to be reported...

No one denies that human trafficking, particularly in the sex trade, is a real problem. While there's probably little doubt that forced labor is a problem in the third world, there is no evidence that slavery or peonage is practiced on U.S. farms in general or Washington farms in particular.

Washington farm groups were rightly enraged by the suggestion.

Washington Potato and Onion Association lobbyist Jim Jesernig, said potato and onion growers were angry, and so was he.

"The supply chain that feeds you and your constituents are our farmers, ranchers and food processors. This accuses them of slavery and human trafficking."

Read the full editorial in The Capital Press
Upcoming Events
«

Dec

»
SMTWTFS
123457
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234

«

Jan

»
SMTWTFS
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272930311