March 4, 2019
Fast Facts
Bringing Business Up to Speed
Top Stories

Raising the B&O tax on service sector employers would hurt medical professionals, patients

The latest edition of AWB Amplified highlights a proposal that would raise taxes significantly on more than 175,000 taxpayers and business owners across the state.

Senate Bill 5129 would raise the business and occupation (B&O) tax on services by 67 percent – meaning doctors, engineers, hair stylists and other employers across the state who provide services to their customers. The current B&O tax rate of 1.5 percent would rise to 2.5 percent.

Medical professionals say the margins to run a medical clinic are tight and increasing the B&O tax could actually mean fewer Medicaid patients are served as a result of the tax increase.

Dr. Chelsea Unruh of Yelm Family Medicine speaks out in this edition, as does D’Arcy Harrison, owner of D’Arcy Hair Design in Seattle.

“This legislation is going to hurt me, my clinic and my patients,” Unruh said.

The new tax idea is a big part of Gov. Jay Inslee’s budget proposal for the 2019-21 state budget cycle.

Today, state government will have about $50 billion to work with over the next two years, AWB’s Clay Hill explains. The governor’s budget proposal would raise about $3.7 billion in new taxes on top of that.

Notably, most of the new tax collections would come from these service businesses. Roughly 175,000 taxpayers would shell out about $2.6 billion.

“This is simply too much to ask of Washington’s small businesses,” Hill says in the video. “Lawmakers will have $50 billion dollars at their disposal to run the state over the next two years, if they don’t raise taxes. It’s time to live within our means.”

For more information or to get involved, contact Hill at 360.943.1600 or

« Back to Main
Workforce Summit This Week
Limiting Worker Choice

Flexible schedules are vital to hospitality industry

By Larry Freshler, a hotel industry professional for 30-plus years

I chose to make my career with hotels because I believe that schedule flexibility is an important benefit of the industry. Scheduling flexibility allows employees to decide when they want to work. Through this option, employees have the opportunity to make the best decisions for their health and the well-being of their families.

As an HR professional, we want to encourage positive working relationships and foster healthy conversations among employees and their employer. Creating a statewide mandate of how employees and employers must interact does not create a good environment or culture. In my experience, no matter where you are in the hotel, as an employee, you have input into your schedule and always have the chance to pick up more shifts if you want them, or vice versa.

A scheduling policy as complex as the one proposed in Olympia would be a logistical nightmare. If this policy were adopted, we would likely need to add staff just to manage the new scheduling demands. Currently we act as a team and schedule our employees taking into considering their schedules and requests. In all my time in HR, I've seen some interesting proposals, but this one limiting the scheduling abilities of employers might be the most burdensome yet...

Read the full guest column in The Spokesman-Review
Attack on Agriculture

Is there slavery in the domestic food supply chain?

By The Capital Press Editorial Board

If the Washington Senate Labor and Commerce Committee has its way, farmers and ranchers who supply large retailers doing business in the Evergreen State could find themselves certifying to those customers that they are not slavers.

Introduced by Seattle Democrat Rebecca Saldana, Senate Bill 5693 mandates that retailers with worldwide sales of more than $200 million require farmers and ranchers to report any incidents of slavery, peonage and human trafficking. Furthermore, the law would require any violation of labor laws to be reported...

No one denies that human trafficking, particularly in the sex trade, is a real problem. While there's probably little doubt that forced labor is a problem in the third world, there is no evidence that slavery or peonage is practiced on U.S. farms in general or Washington farms in particular.

Washington farm groups were rightly enraged by the suggestion.

Washington Potato and Onion Association lobbyist Jim Jesernig, said potato and onion growers were angry, and so was he.

"The supply chain that feeds you and your constituents are our farmers, ranchers and food processors. This accuses them of slavery and human trafficking."

Read the full editorial in The Capital Press
Upcoming Events